May. 25, 2026
| Material | Key Advantages | Key Disadvantages | Best For |
| PET | Crystal clear,Food-safe,High rigidit,Recyclable,Lower material cost than PVC | Brittle, Easy to crack under force | Food packaging,Cosmetic inserts ,High-end product displays, General blister packs |
| PVC | Moderate price, Great formability,Lightweight,Good insulation properties | Not food-contact approved in some regions,Poor eco-friendliness | General blister packs,Blister cards, Stationery & toy packaging |
| PP | Stable, flexible, tough & durableImpact resistant, wear-resistant & heat resistant | Low transparency,Requires higher processing temperature | Laboratory equipment, Medical devices, Plastic straws, Hot food containers |
| PS | Ultra-transparent,Easy vacuum forming | Extremely brittle,Poor heat resistance | Luxury cosmetic packaging, Gift inserts, Delicate item trays |
| Flocking | Luxurious velvet texture, Excellent shock absorption & protection | Higher cost, Complicated production, Not waterproof | Premium gift inserts, Jewelry trays, Fragile goods |
Packaging project requirements decide the right blister material. PET suits food-safe clear packs with competitive costs. Moderately-priced PVC fits daily general packaging. Tough opaque PP works for industrial, medical, food trays. Ultra-transparent PS elevates luxury gift boxes. Soft flocking material protects fragile valuables like jewelry.

Previous: FAQs
May. 28, 2026
Common Blister Materials: PET, PVC, PP, PS, and Flocking Material
May. 25, 2026
Add:No.896,S358 provincial road,Sha- tou Community, Chang'an Town, Dongguan, Guangdong,China 523869
Tel: +86 136 5260 3312
WhatsApp: +852 6090 8972
E-mail: sales02@angzhan.com.cn
Navigation
WRITE US